How Lucas Pope created the unique 1-bit art style of Return of the Obra Dinn, out this week on PS4

13 0
How Lucas Pope created the unique 1-bit art style of Return of the Obra Dinn, out this week on PS4

Solve a murder on a ghost ship in the acclaimed mystery from the Papers Please creator

One bit per pixel. Two colours. 800×450 pixels of high resolution 3D rendering. Finally, a game that unleashes the full power of the Playstation 4.
Now that Obra Dinn is coming to your favourite system, I thought it’d be interesting to look back at how the game’s visual style came about and how it evolved over the years of development.

1987 called

GameTitle on PS4
The original motivation for Obra Dinn was simple: I wanted to make a modern 3D game that looked like the old 1-bit games I played on my family’s Macintosh Plus while growing up.
That system had a tiny but crisp 9″ black and white monitor with 512×342 square pixels. I always loved how games on this Mac looked, and after finishing Papers Please in 2014 my first thought was to throw things back to 1987 and experiment with 3D in 1-bit.
GameTitle on PS4
Using Unity, things came together quickly in the beginning. The title screen was first, where I got a loose handle on using dithering techniques to make the high-contrast black & white pixels look like more gradual shades of gray.
For the 3D style, I decided to prioritise legibility above all else. Even though the inspiration came from the 1-bit limitation, I wanted to make a full proper game of it and do my best to keep players from thinking this limitation was just an annoying excess. Focusing on legibility basically meant two things: 1) outlines on geometry and 2) careful dithering.
GameTitle on PS4

Outlines in geometry

Clear outlines on the geometry like this make understanding the 3D space much easier. You wouldn’t want these if obscuring things was important, or if the draw distance was far enough that outlines on distant objects would clutter the view. Luckily neither of those were issues with the overall theme of the game, or the environmental spaces on the Obra Dinn.

Careful dithering

Dithering 1-bit images to make them appear to have more shades is a well-known technique, but I stumbled onto a few important nuances early on.
First, different dither patterns are good for different things. Grid-like Bayer patterns reproduce a range more accurately, and random-like Blue Noise patterns feel more organic.
The most important thing I realised though is that the game’s low resolution (originally 640×360), when stretched to fullscreen, conflicted badly with the mechanisms that make dithering work. The size of each individual pixel was so physically large that my eyes had trouble combining the dithered patterns of black and white back into shades of gray. Ultimately, the most important part of using dithering was to use it as little as possible.
And so I carried on developing the game with these points in mind.
GameTitle on PS4

Fast forward

Four years later, in 2018, I’d built most of the content for the game and it looked like the thing might be finished soon. After working on non-graphical stuff for so long, I took a moment to reflect on what I had with the visuals.
It wasn’t great.
In a small window, the visuals worked well. But stretched to a full 27″ screen two feet from my face, it was exactly what I feared: a solid case for never making a full-length low-resolution 1-bit game. The huge pixels, high-contrast colors, and dithering effects were just too uncomfortable for long periods of play. If you’ve ever played a slightly-off VR game then you’ll know the feeling.
At that point, the content and design side of the game was too far along to give up on the whole thing so instead I focused my efforts on solving this fullscreen problem. The first try was to experiment with more stylized dithering patterns.
GameTitle on PS4
This looked pretty cool but diverged from the original vision of the game so much that I felt there must be a better way. After more experimentation, I settled on a new dithering technique that attempted to unify the 3D camera with the game’s 2D dither patterns, making the output less flickery without affecting the style.
GameTitle on PS4
Coupled with a slight resolution increase to 800×450, the game finally felt good enough to ship. A couple months later that’s exactly what happened and the game was released on desktops.
GameTitle on PS4
And now, one year later, it’s on PlayStation 4. Credit for getting it onto the system goes to the talented team at Warp Digital Entertainment, who did all the technical work of porting the game, and of course to Unity Technologies for their fantastic multi-platform engine.
If you do check out the game, I hope you enjoy it. Yes, it has a Platinum Trophy.

Join the Conversation

Add a Comment

But don't be a jerk!

Please be kind, considerate, and constructive. Report inappropriate comments to


  • Very interesting insight into the creation of the distinct look of the game.

    But what about the technical aspects of the PS4 version? What is the frame rate and output resolution on PS4 / PS4 Pro?

  • You had me at “Yes, it has a Platinum Trophy.”

  • Now all we need is a remake of 3D Monster Maze. Oh, and Adventure A:Planet of Death too.

  • Absolutely fantastic game; what’s the reason for being more expensive on PSN than other platforms?

    Thank you Lucas for your creativity, hopefully someone at Sony can answer this question.

    • Sony has nothing to do with the price. It’s the dev’s way of making you pay for the porting which he hired a company for. That way he still gets the same profit he got from the PC version. Sadly this happens a lot with indie games.

    • That’s certainly true most of the times, I agree with you on that point, but I’m not sure if it’s the actual reason here. Otherwise, how could we explain that any other port released today (and done, as far as we know, by the same external company) is 19.99€ instead?

      It’s not a discrepancy only with PC, but with the other consoles too. Why’s that? I’d certainly like to know before buying (or not), in case it’s a mistake.


    • Totally agree with you. I wasn’t even aware of the lesser price on Switch and Xbox, and yeah, looks like they were all done by the same company, yet they are 4 Euro less. And even more strange, US store has it at 19,99USD. And GB store has it at 18,99GBP which is 22 Eur. But 24 Eur for rest of EU..

    • i did wonder if it’s a mistake cos Battle Princess Madelyn is £24.49 on Eu PSN but way cheaper on US PSN and other formats and the devs of that game have confirmed that IS a mistake and they can’t figure out why it’s like that cos on their end it’s priced correctly but on the PS store it’s come out wrong and that you should wait until the PS store price is fixed. But for this game? I’ve no idea.

  • £18.99 looks very fair to me.

  • The port of the game came out on the same day as the original steam version a year ago (18/10/18) and the price is 18.99, this a perfect coincidence

  • A great game, but quite taxing on the brain. For best results, play this one with a friend; they’ll notice things you don’t and vice versa.

Leave a Reply

Please enter your date of birth.