LittleBigPlanet 3 and Not A Hero are your PlayStation Plus games this February

178 0
LittleBigPlanet 3 and Not A Hero are your PlayStation Plus games this February

Starwhal, Anna- Extended Edition, Ninja Senki DX and TorqueL also up for download

As we bid a not-so-found farewell to January’s fad diets, failed gym memberships and freezing ground frosts (congrats, if you’re keeping up with the resolutions, by the way!), it’s time once again to welcome in a new month and, as always, a fresh new package of games for PlayStation Plus.

Leading this charge in February, it’s PlayStation’s unofficial mascot and all-round cosplay aficionado Sackboy – and he’s brought some chums…

LittleBigPlanet 3

The mysterious planet Bunkum requires the keen eyes of a master investigator – so why not send someone whose peepers are actually plastic buttons? Yes, loveable craft creation Sackboy is taking on a new adventure and he’s brought some friends along to keep him company.

Building on the super-creative style of series predecessors, outside of the main story campaign you’ll be free to create and edit your own levels using bits and pieces you collect along the way, and then share your creations online.

Check out our forthcoming post on the best user-created levels already out there if you need a little inspiration!

Not A Hero

Right, okay, we know politics is the proverbial blue touch paper of the moment – but bear with us: we’ve got a giant purple time-travelling rabbit here who wants to run for city mayor – he just needs a little help on the campaign trail. Interested?

In bold contrast to the family-friendly environs of LBP’s Imagisphere, Not A Hero enjoins you to aid the foul-mouthed BunnyLord in a campaign of unprecedented violence, irresponsible use of explosives and general disregard for due process.

A lightning-fast side-scrolling shoot ’em up featuring an absolute rogues’ gallery of playable characters, Not A Hero is unlike anything you’ve played before. It thoroughly deserves your patronage when it hits the service on 7th February.

On top of these two delightful gems, PS4 players will also net a couple of extra nuggets of gold via the magic of Cross-Buy: Starwhal, which will be coming to PS3 can also be downloaded on PS4, along with Ninja Senki DX and TorqueL from PS Vita’s selection.

Here’s the full line-up, available to download on 7th February:

  • LittleBigPlanet 3 (PS4)
  • Not a Hero (PS4)
  • Starwhal (PS3, Cross Buy with PS4)
  • Anna: Extended Edition (PS3)
  • Ninja Senki DX (PS Vita, Cross Buy with PS4)
  • TorqueL (PS Vita, Cross Buy with PS4)

Last call for January

February’s titles will be available to download on PlayStation Store from 7th February (next Tuesday), until then, you still have a chance to grab any titles you might have missed from January:

Join the Conversation

Add a Comment

But don't be a jerk!

Please be kind, considerate, and constructive. Report inappropriate comments to


  • Click on one of the two comments below that corresponds better on how you feel about this ps+ update.
    Please, click only one (and vote one time only), so that the results are representative of our feelings towards it. Thank you.

    • >> I enjoy this month’s ps+ update.

    • >> I don’t enjoy this month’s ps+ update.

    • Come on, at least they gave an AAA game

    • @mh637099: At this point, I think it’s going be “Knack or GTFO” for the foaming at the mouth PS+ naysayer crowd.

    • Its the proper answer to Microsofts Project Car ;). It took a lot of thought though(the reason for the delay of the announcement).

    • @mh637099 Littlebigplanet 3 is not a AAA game by any stretch of the term “AAA”. Not complaining about the game, one I’ve wanted for a while but just never got round to getting, but don’t get a big(-ish) name confused with a AAA game.

    • Persoally I don’t make much use of online gaming but for my £3.35 a month I always feel like I’m on to a really good thing subscribing with ps+ and get much more content than I’ve paid for regardless of the platform or developer type. :-)

    • If you did the Humble Monthly Bundle on PC last month, you already got Project Cars.
      For our $12 a month we get games we actually want out of a far bigger selection.

    • No denying that But I talk about fantastic pc bundles in the relevant forum. Was on about ps+

  • decent enough

  • ha, been wanting to try Not a Hero for a while, so it’s good!

  • Get rid of the PS3 games already and release proper PS4 titles. I never comment since I’m usually content with the games but seriously – who cares about PS3 games? Scrap them and give us some ass-kicking games.

    • If you’re so unhappy with the PS4 line-up, buy the remaining consoles. I have PS2/3/4/P/Vita so I’m happy with any PS+ addition, even PSP-only or PSX classics. I also have quite a few PS3-only or Vita-only friends so there are still many people caring for those games.

      Not so long ago we got Yakuza 5 and Eiyuu Senki: The World Conquest – notable PS3 exclusives. Get your facts straight.

      If you want ass-kicking games, try actually playing those PS4-PS+ games. Or throw your money at full-priced AAA titles and be… well, I hope you won’t be disappointed but it’s not that rare with AAA titles recently.

    • Where does this weird idea come from that if they drop the PS3 or Vita games they’ll put more PS4 games in?

      There’s minimal logic there, the more likely answer is two things we’ll happen.

      1) We’ll get less games.
      2) Everyone with a PS3 or Vita will complain about having things taken away fro no good reason.

    • “Who cares about PS3 games?”
      Well, I do!!! ;D Even though I have a PS4, I still have (and use!!) my old trusty PS3. Plus, I have a PS Vita too. ;)
      And I doubt that I’m the only one, who still enjoys playing Last Gen games. ;)
      Anyway, not all people can afford a PS4. Why should they be left out??

    • I don’t even have a PS4 yet. I was waiting for a PS4 SuperSlim, but now I’m going with Pro. And, well, I will get one in March, but not because I want it thaaat much. No, I only pick it up now because Rockstar is turning off their PS3-to-PS4 character transfer service for GTA5 in March. I’m currently happy enough with my PS3SS and my OLED-Vita.
      There are only three things to be sad about, related with Vita.
      – That we (mostly) only get Indies for Vita via PS+.
      – I mean, yeah we got FreedomWars and two Otome-VNs, but, I mean, people obviously own a Vita for Japanese games… Well, okay, I’m not complaining, when I’m clicking through sales I feel like I have nearly the whole Japanese Vita library that is available on EU-PSN anyway…
      – It’s very sad that we can’t access US-, Asia- and JP-PSN with our Vita.

      And for PS3 I still have hundreds of unplayed games here. *shrugs* They just should come at me.
      …Wish I wouldn’t lack in motivation to play something, though.

      So, ehm, please tell me more about what I should care about and what not. :)

    • I’m not sure sony have even contemplated an end game for ps3/vita. Surely if you stop the service for them you have to let them keep the games even if they no longer subscribe

    • I think it’s better to stop giving Vita games. There aren’t any AAA Vita games left to give us so we get 2 more indies. They can use the money of these two for better PS4 or PS3 games.

    • They would need to give at least 1 years notice before discontinuing PS+ anyway. Its also been clear for quite a while that the bottom of the barrel is being scraped when it comes to ps3/Vita offerings and theres little chance that its going to improve.

    • I still play some PS3 games so am happy they still come with the deal. Last month This War of Mine was a cool little game and even being a member since the start, for the price I think we get a great deal!!!

    • You got 5 games for your ps4!

    • Don’t scrap PS3 games and give decent PS4 games. Everyone’s a winner

      I don’t have a PS4 and there’s a huge catalog of amazing PS3 games to choose from which I’m sure can be acquired very easily as these games are not likely to make devs and publishers money anymore. We all know publishers love to give away prequels when sequels are coming up.

      Give me some acclaimed JRPG’s or something hard to find.

      It’s frustrating to be given games I can get from humble bundles or on steam for pennies.

    • There’s always an idiot that says “Get rid of the PS3 games already(…)”

  • More like pixelstation plus

  • Seeing Starwahl popping up in the Norwegian store yesterday, two years late, I knew it would be coming to the IGC.

  • 2 of 6 are KINDA…just barely kinda interesting…the other 4 are just total and pure utter garbage…awesome, just…awesome.

    How is it possible that Sony is the best when it comes to games, exclusives and content..but manages to shoot themselves in the foot month after month with PS+

    The last 4 games…you would have to pay me a lot…to play those…that’s how bad they are

  • Pretty rubbish. As someone who owns and plays all three platforms its disappointing that Vita and PS3 are just used for cross-buy padding. Torquel, yay?

  • Maybe you guys should show some appreciation this month, then Sony may continue giving free AAA games.
    On the other hand, I wonder if they are doing this because it’s not doing well.

  • Another month with nothing worth the download.and an envious look over the road.

  • Maybe update the link on the front page? Just for laughs? It’s WordPress, can’t be that hard.

  • LBP3 and maybe TorqueL and Anna…

  • Bought LBP3 almost a year ago for the price of 1 month of PS+ and it’s not even cross-buy for the trophies on PS3, available on the service a year too late considering the level of its success and that it’s directly from Sony. If you like the series, then it may be worth your time. Quickly reviewed everything else and… thank you, but no. Nothing to download for another month. (Un)fortunately, I don’t think I’ll be renewing PS+ in the future, as my interest in using the service has been declining for many months (years?), and is now gone entirely, it’s no longer of any use to me, and limited storage cloud saves could also be free. I don’t play online on PS4 (it should be free to begin with and available to every player), lottery rental has been hitting rock bottom for too long.

  • I’m cool with this lot even though I already have LBP3 and Ninja Senki. Also means my friends who recently got a PS4 can have LBP3 for free & we can play it together. :)

  • LBP3 is cool, but why even bother with PS3 and Vita games? So many to choose from on the Vita and yet you release awful game after awful game, since everything has to be cross buy for some reason…

  • Bit weak considering that Asian PS Plus got God of War Remaster 3 and Tales of Zesteria last month due to the chinese new year…

  • People moan that we don’t get AAA games and when we do…. They moan that its not good enough. We’re not getting AAA games on release day, get over yourselves [DELETED]

    • Littlebigplanet 3 is not a AAA game. It’s a niche title (which I want myself!) that’s only included in the hope people will buy the DLC. Do wish people would stop confusing a big name game with a AAA game – and that’s both the pro and anti PS Plus crowds!

  • SySar 1 February, 2017 @ 4:59 pm 15 Report
    Not a hero is in the 60% off sale at the moment. So the plan is encourage as many people to buy it then boom give it away free! Not cool! NOT COOL!

    • That’s what happend to me: bought NAH last weekend in the sale and now it’s on PS+. But I’m not complaining; sometimes these things happen.

    • I think it used to be Sony’s official policy that they would not include games in the Instant Game Collection that had recently been on sale.

      Much like Phil Collins, they just don’t care anymore.

  • Lbp3 might be worth a download, loved 1 and 2.

  • Hopefully one day we see The Order 1886 on the PS Plus games collection

    • You could probably get it pre-owned for £10 now.

    • Buy some paint, stick it on the wall, watch it dry and you’ll have more fun. If you’re that desperate to try it then I saw it in Game, second hand, for £4 the other day. That’s £3.99 too much.

    • But it, platinum it, sell it 5 hours later. Visually pleasing but that’s about it.

    • If you want it, go buy it! It’s a great game. And thanks to all the kids who like nothing but twitch shooters and bright colours with flashing lights its dirt cheap.

    • And thanks to all the people who like games that are actually good rather than beautiful but mind-numbingly boring garbage, its dirt cheap.

      I fixed the last sentence in your comment Mikey_TheDream. You’re welcome pal.

  • Nothing I’d really enjoy playing but this is a fair month for PS4 gamers.

  • I don’t care for LBP, but at least it’s objectively decent series. The rest looks like a complete shovelware. I like good indie games, I paid full price for many, but I’m definitely not interested in bargain bin reject indie games. I have been disappointed with PS+ content for many months now, but there was always something that would at least justify the price. LBP aside, I wouldn’t pay one quid to own those, let alone lease them. Just stop giving PS3 stuff monthly if this is the best you can do – go down to one game a quarter, but at least make it a worthwhile game. We once got Deus Ex: HR and Darksiders in a single month and then Red Dead Redemption, the co-op Lara Croft, Saints Row 2 and Machinarium within the next two. To go from that to this is not even funny anymore. Step up your game.

  • You guys are marketing this all wrong.


    (and you don’t even bother to whisper over in the corner- psst there’s 4 other games here too . Your video only mentions two of the six and you only have descriptions for two on the blog too)

    I came to find out what the PS+ games are and I only know two out of the six!

    • Because 4 out of 6 aren’t worth mentioning (considering the PS4 ones are even worth mentioning…)
      2 of them are for their last-gen console (which, by now, PS4 will soon be replacing), and 2 for their dead portable that they couldn’t bother to support properly to begin with.
      They’re pretty much just there to add to the numbers, not to use for promotion :)

    • You can click the titles in their description to check the games on the website (and probably confirm that you won’t be needing them :p)

    • Maybe they think not talking about them will make it will be less noticeable when they stop giving away PS3/Vita games next year?

  • My 4k TV its ready to play this pixels games… ????

  • Waste of hard drive space yet again !!!!

  • I already own LBP3, so this month isn’t too exciting for me. Anna – Extended Edition looks somewhat interesting, so I’ll probably give that a go. However, I’m not too sure I can be bothered to even try any of the other games. I could maybe see myself messing around with Starwhal for about 15 minutes, but nothing else even remotely piques my interest.

    Oh well… I’ve got plenty of games on my backlog as it is.

  • This years subscription cost: justified.
    What an awesome selection of games.
    Get ’em down yer neck, you whingeing buffoons.

  • I’m happy happy that i have Xbox Live also :) Have Plus because my friends have PS4, have Live for better giveaway games. Win every month.

  • Great, continuing the tradition of disappointment.

    LittleBigPlanet is a trash platformer, it was never a good series, controls like floaty garbage and now we get the worst one out of all of them.

    Not A Hero is a PC game that came out almost 2 years ago and I played it many times, keep putting on old PC games guys!

    Starwhal is also an old PC game that released over 2 years ago.

    Anna is one of the worst horror games I had the misfortune to play, a walking simulator with a terrible ending.

    Ninja Senki DX is not a good game at all, mediocre at best.

    TorqueL is again, guess what?! A 3 year old PC game!

    Every once in a while we’ll get a real treat like FURI but it’s been unbelievably trash recently…

  • Absolutely terrible again! Woooo we got a a AAA game that’s for 12 year olds….. And the rest indie games! I’m sick of it. I use to play plus games all the time… I hardly ever play them now… An why do we not get proper PS3 games anymore!? All the good games you could put on before the PS3 dies and you give us rubbish… Ridiculous. PS plus before PS4 was awesome now it just sucks.

    • Even before PS4, people were whining. “Waaaah…… Crappy games….. We want…….. Meeeeeh…..”
      So nothing has really changed.

    • At least it was optional before PS4 :)

    • It’s still optional. You don’t need it to play your games, now do you? (except for some multiplayer only games).

      I understand people don’t like games with pixel graphics (btw LBP are good games, I don’t see why they are for 12 year olds. I am 32 and I still enjoy them, although the first 2 were better imo), but complaining about it every single month is not going to solve anything.

      If you don’t like PS+, why do you keep paying for it? You can vote with your wallet if you don’t agree with it.

      If you do need it for multiplayer, you get your money out of it as you use it for multiplayer (I hardly ever play MP and I don’t really mind paying for PS+ (and Xbox Live Gold)).

      If you really want to play MP for free, buy a PC for those titles and get rid of PS+. It’s not that hard.

    • Btw, why would they ever change the games they are giving with PS+ when everybody just moans but still pays for it every single month. As long as people are buying it, there is no need for them to do anything…

    • *the type of games they are giving

      Btw, Sony DOES need the money for their network as it sucks since PS3 days compared to the others (excluding Nintendo). That said, I do hope to see some improvements. It still are the same crappy speeds from when I bought my PS3 unfortunately.

    • well i will need this game to mentaly came back after god of war 3

  • Other than Starwhal, which is kind of like Nidhogg on a single screen with space dolphins, this doesn’t seem a bad month.

  • Dont get why anyone moans at free games. What I do is look at what they are, if I would like to play ill try it, if not I wont play any and it dont bother me, I dont mind buying games I want to play, and if next month the list of games that comes out is game Im not bothered about, guess what, I just wont play them and wont be bothered. There free games, play them or dont, simple.

  • I really wish people would stop bagging on the IGC every month.

    The best reason to cut off your subs to Sony is their terrible customer service, the games are decent enough.

    • Their IGC for all consoles over the last 4 years makes their terrible customer service look like something heaven sent.

  • Awful as literally always, for me at least. Figures the first decent (good in general, but my least favourite of the LBP’s) AAA in a very short list for PS4 (for which it’s mandatory, no less) should be an exclusive that I already own..
    Might have given Not a Hero a try on Vita but it’s the smartphone games that get the cross-buy option. Of which none are of interest again.
    Seems clear to me now I’m going to have to sub for shorter periods (of course, in typical modern Sony fashion, those are the subs that got more expensive), only when I plan on playing a multiplayer game in that period.
    It’s a real shame you guys refuse to offer a subscription for online capabilities only because I would prefer being online all year around without all the hassle, but not like this anymore. Not with this monthly disappointment that we get to pay for extra. If it has to be all or nothing with you corporate fat cats, so be it.

  • I’m looking forward to LBP again. I played it at launch and thought it was the weakest of them. It’s the community content that has always made LBP games though and that was a little thin when I played it.

  • And yet again, I sit and think to myself, how demanding and unthankful (some) people are.
    Look at it this way :
    The money we pay for PS+, is used to continuously maintain, and further develope and improve on the Playstation Network, which is ESSENTIAL to play online.
    This means upgrading hardware and software – and paying salaries to the people who do the work.
    Or do you really think, that running an extensive network is free?? ;)
    *For those of you, who don’t yet understand the concept of earning money for the work you do : It’s what makes adults able to pay rent (and other bills), buy food, buy clothes, and buy “fun stuff” like GAMES!!! ;) Or would you rather work for free?? I thought not… ;) *
    Anyway, the monthly games is Sony’s way to give a little extra bonus back to the people, who support them.
    It may not be much. But it’s something – and something is better than nothing, right? ;)

    Ofcourse, if you’re not satisfied, you are free to unsubscribe, right?! ;)

    • Maybe you would have a point if it had improved at all since PS3

    • And yet again, I sit and.. well, write on this gameblog of how I think to myself, how undemanding and naively thankful (lowering the bar for everyone involved) (some) people are.

      SOME money we pay for PS+ (highly likely a very small sum, if, like an adult, you can do the math that PS+ cost just as much in the past as an optional subscription as it does now) is used to maintain PSN. Eventhough PS3 proved perfectly capable of this without extra costs.

      And even so, what’s your fanboyish excuse for them combining the online costs with a subscription like PS+? So that, on top of suddenly having to pay for online, we HAVE TO also pay for some completely unrelated digital rental service to actually get our online. Yea, that’s a good thing, right? They’re so good to us, the people who support them! Jezus Christ people, wake up already!

    • What Tazman said….nicely put! :-)

    • @Stonesthrow : You are aware, that Sony was actually LOSING money in the PS3 era, right? Not only were they losing money on the consoles themselves, but also, as I mentioned, running a network-service isn’t cheap (and therefore not free!!). Not to mention the estimated 171 million dollars they lost in revenue during the 23 days of downtime, when the Playstation Network was hacked, back in 2011.
      Don’t believe me?? Search “playstation network losing money” in Google. ;)

      Anyway, you would understand the following, if you were running a business :
      What do you do, if you are losing money?
      Find a way to EARN money, ofcourse!!!
      Obviously, no money means no business.

      Or would you just keep giving your things away for FREE, if it was your business?? ;)

    • @Tazman-Baaring Wake up lad. We pay for a service which is worse than when it was free and get given a number of games a month that are of a considerably huge decrease in quality according to the vast majority of people (rightly or wrongly) who pay for the service.

      How there’s still people who haven’t cottoned on to the fact the ‘free’ games are now worse (again, in the vast majority’s opinion, right or not) because we’re paying for the online stuff is baffling. Sony used to entice you to join PS Plus with amazing games, normally including a must-have title. Now they have your money anyway and don’t give a damn.

      Really is that simple.

    • Enough with this condescending tone.

      PC games are running online yet you do not pay for access to the servers. You pay for the game and you can play it online. So how is Sony making customers pay extra for online ok?

      Develop and improve? That was precious. Download bandwith is capped extremely low which makes games download for ages. And the PS Store interface is horrible.

      But that was true from the start and people were saying: At least you get great games for free. Well, not anymore.

    • Tazman, we aren’t getting the games for ‘free’. We’re renting them. Once your subscription ends you cannot play those games anymore.

    • “Don’t believe me?? Search “playstation network losing money” in Google. ????”

      Haha! Sure, everything on Google is true… [DELETED]

      You have no idea how business works… Shareholders make the decisions and they care about money, if PS3 wasn’t making any they’d have charged for the service or dropped the console…

    • I see that I fail to get my point across.
      I will, however, respond to a few of your comments.

      “We pay for a service which is worse than when it was free”
      So the fact, that the Playstation Network is conciderably more secure now, than it was just a few years back, is what you see as “worse”?
      And DON’T try to convince me that there isn’t any downtime on other networks too. ;)

      “PC games are running online yet you do not pay for access to the servers.”
      Now… Is that true with EVERY game??
      What about a game like World of Warcraft? ;)
      League of Legends?
      Last I checked, they required a subscribtion to be able to play – and I’m pretty sure that there are other games which to that too. ;)

      “Sure, everything on Google is true…”
      While it may, in some cases, be true that every human, from time to time, more or less, is an imbecile, you can’t seriously try and convince me that EVERYTHING on Google is false? :)
      Besides, I find to be a pretty credible source (that’s where I got the estimated 171 million from). ;)

      “Shareholders make the decisions and they care about money, if PS3 wasn’t making any they’d have charged for the service or dropped the console…”
      BINGO!!!! :D But why did you try to use that against me, when it actually supports my point?? ;)
      Yes, the shareholders want to earn money!! You would too, if you had shares in Sony (and any other business). Right? ;)
      And YES, they had the choice to either discontinue the Playstation, OR (which is the one they obviously chose) start charging for the service!!!!!!!!! ;D

    • Dont you remember the time before PSN, Steam etc. when playing online was FREE. Playing against those russian hackers who shoot the [DELETED] out of you though walls is Medal of Honor or COD :))) Now you think “mantaining” this service is cost money? No! Its still free, but you are forced to pay for it (which is a disgrace, sold as a privilage or something). The “free” games are just bait.
      If you pay to play online anyway, why they should try? Remember the lineup from 2014? Then they put the bar so you think to pay for the subscription is for the games and dont bother that you have to pay to play online!!

    • Dude are you for real?
      Do you even know what World of Warcraft is?
      It’s an MMORPG you know why it needs subscription? Because it has a team that makes content
      on a regular basis + they have to keep the servers alive + they make expansion packs.
      They NEED this monthly fee to exist.. Sony doesn’t.
      Steam doesn’t take your money so you’ll be able to play online, and still they don’t lose money.
      and LoL is a free game what are you talking about..?

    • You forgot ???? to put ???? enough ???? winking ???? emoticons ???? in your post ????

      Condescending much

    • Wow you guys really have no idea how the real world networks work. Sony have their own massive server farm that costs them MILLIONS, if not more, on a monthly basis just to MAINTAIN them. You are not talking about some random PC game whose online is either ad-hoc based (meaning one player plays host aka it’s using the player’s network bandwidth not the game’s) or are RENTING their server space and bandwidth from a service provider, like Sony, that have their own server farm as their product. Game dev studios having their own server farms are an extreme rarity and they are usually the “big dogs” that have a massive online player base, like Blizzard and possibly EA. Bringing up services like Steam is ridiculous too; they are not the same. Steam is just a store, nothing more. Would it make sense to you if you were charged just to access an online store?! Steam isn’t providing the network connection of the games on it, they are providing download bandwidth, which the developers and publishers pay big money for through their mandatory sales fees to Steam. Comparing Steam to PSN would be more accurate if Sony was demanding an existing paid subscription to be able to access the store! Yes, it is THAT ridiculous of a notion. You pay your ISP to have an internet connection, don’t you? What’s the bloody difference? I’ll say this: there isn’t any, except the “product” is different, but it’s the same business model. What Sony is charging is extremely CHEAP, in most regions anyways. Just $50-$60 for an entire year’s access, just a few dollars a month. They are charging a single game’s cost to provide you access for an entire year, helping them maintain and expand the network to accommodate the ever growing playerbase. This is only expensive or worth complaining about in countries where $50 has the value of $500 or $5000 in terms of wages and living costs (like places where they barely earn $1/hr, etc). If a single game’s cost per year is too bloody expensive for you then you should be better prioritizing and managing your money.

  • Yay more 2d crap.Screw off too. I paid for PS plus and keep getting games I don’t like. Sorry my kind of games are GOOD and not this old crap noone wants. Take 2 seconds Sony. Find a game people actually want that has a good hour value and the rest could be crap for all I care.

  • I just have to say this. sony. Stop it.

  • Great! Suits me fine! :)

  • I VOTE Sony adds a voting system to ps store each month with 10 good games for each month and the 3 most popular games that are chosen out of the 10 gets added to ps plus ps4 games that month insted of sony picking the worst games for ps plus each month im starting to think sony are deliberately adding bad games to ps plus so SONY ADD A VOTING SYSTEM TO PS STORE EACH MONTH and let the real gamers vote 4 what we want

    • I actually would like that a lot less than what we currently have. I mean, I like that I get a bundle of games that I’ve heard of but I probably wouldn’t otherwise buy.

      I don’t want the popular choice, or it’s just going to be “whatever game on the list had the biggest marketing budget when it launched”, and that’s a bit boring, and more likely to contain stuff I already owned.

    • I understand the logic of that but I reckon that psv and ps3 games would be a voting minority so those that do appreciate games on those two consoles would never get any so I also see the logic of how it is currently done.

    • This would work for me if you had to vote for a AAA and a separate vote for Psn /indie games, as I do like the odd psn game.
      I think otherwise people would vote for AAA alllllllllll the time.

    • I believe they only did that once or twice to try to satisfy the disappointed masses. It’s probably also why they refuse to offer an online-only sub seperated from PS+. From a business point of view I can see the logic in it, it’s the least costly option that generates the most profit. If they put more games on offer to choose from, they have to pay more of those publishers to make those games available for PS+.
      Same goes with an online-only sub. This would be perfectly feasible but then they wouldn’t make full profit off those 6 games they put up for rent every month (since not everyone would be subscribed to the more expensive PS+ sub for online). From a consumer point of view, however, I think it’s entirely unethical.

    • last time vote happen it was worstest month so no thank you

  • Have just got ps plus. Can you use the ps3 games etc on ps4? Thanks

    • No, you can only play them on their respective consoles. You can still add them to your download list if they are ‘cross buy’ or by using the web playstation store too.

  • Forgot to add,, how bout sony scraps ps plus games and lets us pick 3 games from a selection of 10 each month like when psn was down for months and we had to pick 2 free games from the 5 from sony

  • Comparing this to this month’s Xbox gold (Project cars, Star Wars) I am starting to regret buying PS4.

Leave a Reply

Please enter your date of birth.