The Evil Within, LEGO Worlds, and Cities: Skylines join PS Now in February

No ones talking about adding every single game. We’re talking about games that have been out for years and they, themselves sell for $15. There’s no reason why PLAYSTATION exclusives cant be permanent on a PLAYSTATION serive. Especially when there are already dozens of others on there. What I’m talking about is adding the other old exclusives, that currently arent on the service.

These are reasonable improvements to a service that is in dire need of improvement. How do you expect something to get better if you just accept whatever they give you? You talk about the price being $5 a month. It would still be $100 a year if people didn’t complain.

This service is “good” but certainly not great and there a plenty of things they need to do to improve. Theres a reason why there are 100 million PS4s and only 1 million people use PS Now. Meanwhile 6-8 million people subscribe to Game pass despite being more expensive and Xbox having a smaller install base.

Actually, Sony said it themselves that they have 1 million subscribers
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.videogameschronicle.com/news/playstation-now-game-streaming-service-hits-1-million-subscribers/amp/

And its estimated that game pass has around 9 million subscribers.
https://www.videogameschronicle.com/features/xbox-scarlett-inside-microsofts-plans-for-the-next-xbox/

And you’re missing the point. If xbox has a smaller install base and less fans that logically they should have less people subscribe to a service thats more expensive than PS Now. But in reality, even though there are a 100 million people with a PS4 only 1 million of them has this service? Why is that? Maybe ite because, even though it’s good. It’s not proving most people with something that they feel they need.

It’s ok to like this service. But criticism is ok too. The $5 a month price that you love bringing up only came about because people complained about the price being to expensive. It’s ok to like the service, but being a corporate cheerleader is cringy.

I don’t see anyone arguing against a lower price.

I’ve been renewing every Dec since 2016. Didn’t last year. Ever since we got the much needed price drop, the quality of additions has dropped. Not saying the games they’re adding are bad. But only getting 3 games a month. And 1 being temporary isn’t very good.

All of Sony’s PS2, PS3, and most PS4 classics should already be there. And there should be more franchises added. And like you said, there should be a dedicated PS Now Twitter. But then again. What would be the point when there are barely any improvements made to the service?

I wish they took this service more seriously and actually listened to the feedback their customers are giving them. Like, it cant be that difficulty to listen to feedback.

Same. I suspect that as well.

Having an old game being added to the service isn’t a bad thing as long as it’s good. In fact, there are plenty of older games that would be good to have in the service.
Like GTA, Yakuza, Final Fantasy, Kingdom Hearts, Hitman series, Splinter Cell series, Prince of Persia series, Mass Effect, Dead Space.

“I’d also suggest that you consider staggering releases throughout the month. Instead of dumping the whole lump of games at the top of the month, you could instead roll out at least 2 or 3 games each week. This gives users something to look forward on a weekly basis, and keeps PS Now involved in the conversation. A similar service on a competing console does this, and that’s one reason why their service is constant topic of discussion, while PS Now justs gets a brief look at the top of the month and then disappears from view”

This is a REALLY good suggestion. If we had new game to look forward to every other week, it would keep the service feeling fresh and keep it a relevant topic for discussion. I cosign this!